The One Click Group

The One Click Group
Health Advocacy

RSS Feed Follow OneClickGroup on Twitter

Dr Iain Stephenson
Found Guilty of Vaccine
Research Fraud
The One Click Group

Mobilising ME/CFS Charities
To Smash Flawed
PACE Trial Results
Lara, Health Advocate

UK Public Health
In Dire Straits
Dr Dick van Steenis MBBS

Lies Damned Lies
Swine Flu
Statistics Exposed
By Lara

Vaccination Graphs
The Awful Stats In Action
Raymond Obomsawin Ph.D

Issues In Immunization
Theory And Practice
Raymond Obomsawin Ph.D

March 2010

One Click
Of Information
UK Police Harassment
In The Internet Era

Barbara Loe Fisher
NVIC Conference
Style, Gonads
Brass Ovaries
By Jane Bryant

New Journalism
Status Quo
By Jane Bryant
NVIC Conference

How The
Judicial Review
NICE Guidelines
Was Lost
Jane Bryant
The One Click Group

Vaccines Propaganda
David Salisbury
Public Relations

David Southall
"A Very
Dangerous Doctor"
Panorama swims
with sharks
Lisa Blakemore Brown

Dr David Salisbury
Never Mind Me,
I'm Basil Fawlty!

David Salisbury
Vaccine Litigation

The Politics
And Commerce
Of Autism
By Lisa Blakemore Brown

Vaccine/Autism Case
Mitochondrial Disfunction
ME/CFS Patients

The Consensus Report
Family Law Reform

Canadian Definition of ME-CFS

The Weird World of Wikipedia
By Martin J. Walker

Click here to email us with any thoughts or opinions you wish to share about the website.


News Archives 5361-5380
Number Title Post Date
5361 Skåne hardest hit by swine flu vaccine narcolepsy 20/02/2012 13:27:37
5362 Inquiry: five babies in same street have rare birth defect 20/02/2012 13:28:57
5363 Occupy London grounds for appeal dismissed – Statement from John Cooper QC 22/02/2012 12:23:09
5364 Young disabled stay silent over hate crimes 22/02/2012 12:27:15
5365 Will Fraudgate now engulf Murdoch's Sunday Times? 22/02/2012 12:34:07
5366 'Will anything sensible be done?' asked Gore Vidal about the drug war, 40 years ago. So far, there's no sign 22/02/2012 12:39:15
5367 Family welcomes new inquest into schoolboy’s death after MMR vaccine 22/02/2012 12:41:40
5368 Panel to examine death of baby given polio vaccine 22/02/2012 12:43:02
5369 Pharma Fraud: withheld clinical trial data shows antidepressants no better than dummy pills 22/02/2012 12:44:46
5370 Occupy London vows to symbolically and peacefully mark eviction 24/02/2012 12:18:37
5371 WikiLeaks suspect Bradley Manning defers plea, court-martial begins 24/02/2012 12:23:34
5372 David Cameron's Welfare Reform - Benefits cut man hangs himself 24/02/2012 12:26:06
5373 Serious Fraud Office to investigate Sunday Times if whistleblower comes forward… 24/02/2012 12:27:35
5374 Wild Westminster: MP charged with assault after Commons bar fracas 24/02/2012 12:29:06
5375 5 Reasons You Should Never Agree to a Police Search (Even if You Have Nothing to Hide) 24/02/2012 12:31:59
5376 Vermont Parents Fight to Save Philosophical Exemption 24/02/2012 12:33:20
5377 2,600 lawsuits over Levaquin antibiotic damage moving through US courts 24/02/2012 12:35:12
5378 Alcoholism common among surgeons 24/02/2012 12:36:26
5379 WL press release: The Global Intelligence Files 27/02/2012 11:40:53
5380 Mother could face jail because her children talked to each other on Facebook 27/02/2012 11:43:04

[Previous] [Next]

5 Reasons You Should Never Agree to a Police Search (Even if You Have Nothing to Hide)
Share |

5 Reasons You Should Never Agree to a Police Search (Even if You Have Nothing to Hide)

From the streets of the Bronx to the suburbs of the Nation's Capital, you never have to look hard to find victims of the bias and corruption delivered by the drug war.
February 22, 2012  | Do you know what your rights are when a police officer asks to search you? If you're like most people I've met in my eight years working to educate the public on this topic, then you probably don't.

It's a subject that a lot of people think they understand, but too often our perception of police power is distorted by fictional TV dramas, sensational media stories, silly urban myths, and the unfortunate fact that police themselves are legally allowed to lie to us.

It wouldn't even be such a big deal, I suppose, if our laws all made sense and our public servants always treated us as citizens first and suspects second. But thanks to the War on Drugs, nothing is ever that easy. When something as stupid as stopping people from possessing marijuana came to be considered a critical law enforcement function, innocence ceased to protect people against police harassment. From the streets of the Bronx to the suburbs of the Nation's Capital, you never have to look hard to find victims of the biasincompetence, andcorruption that the drug war delivers on a daily basis.

Whether or not you ever break the law, you should be prepared to protect yourself and your property just in case police become suspicious of you. Let's take a look at one of the most commonly misunderstood legal situations a citizen can encounter: a police officer asking to search your belongings. Most people automatically give consent when police ask to perform a search. However, I recommend saying "no" to police searches, and here are some reasons why:

1. It's your constitutional right.

The 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects us against unreasonable searches and seizures. Unless police have strong evidence (probable cause) to believe you're involved in criminal activity, they need your permission to perform a search of you or your property.

You have the right to refuse random police searches anywhere and anytime, so long as you aren't crossing a border checkpoint or entering a secure facility like an airport. Don't be shy about standing up for your own privacy rights, especially when police are looking for evidence that could put you behind bars.

2. Refusing a search protects you if you end up in court.

It's always possible that police might search you anyway when you refuse to give consent, but that's no reason to say "yes" to the search. Basically, if there's any chance of evidence being found, agreeing to a search is like committing legal suicide, because it kills your case before you even get to court.

If you refuse a search, however, the officer will have to prove in court that there was probable cause to do a warrantless search. This will give your lawyer a good chance to win your case, but this only works if you said "no" to the search.

3. Saying "no" can prevent a search altogether.

Data on police searches are interesting, but they don't show how many searches didn't happen becausea citizen said no. A non-search is a non-event that goes unrecorded, giving rise to a widespread misconception that police will always search with or without permission.

I know refusing searches works because I've been collecting stories from real police encounters. The reality is that police routinely ask for permission to search when they have absolutely no evidence of an actual crime. If you remain calm and say no, there's a good chance they'll back down, because it's a waste of time to do searches that won't hold up in court anyway.

4. Searches can waste your time and damage your property.

Do you have time to sit around while police rifle through your belongings? Police often spend 30 minutes or more on vehicle searches and even longer searching homes. You certainly can't count on officers to be careful with valuables or to put everything back where they found it. If you waive your 4th Amendment rights by agreeing to be searched, you will have few legal options if any property is damaged or missing after the search.

5. You never know what they'll find.

Are you 100 percent certain there's nothing illegal in your home or vehicle? You can never be too sure. A joint roach could stick to your shoe on the street and wind up on the floorboard. A careless acquaintance could have dropped a baggie behind the seat. Try telling a cop it isn't yours, and they'll just laugh and tell you to put your hands behind your back. If you agreed to the search, you can't challenge the evidence. But if you're innocent and you refused the search, your lawyer has a winnable case.

Remember that knowing your rights will help you protect yourself, but no amount of preparation can guarantee a good outcome in a bad situation. Your attitude and your choices before, during, and after the encounter will usually matter more than your knowledge of the law. Stay calm no matter what happens, and remember that you can always report misconduct after things settle down.

Finally, please don't be shy about sharing this information with your friends and family. Understanding and asserting your rights isn't about getting away with anything, and it isn't about disrespecting police either. These rights are the foundation of freedom in America, and they get weaker whenever we fail to exercise them.

Scott Morgan is Associate Director of and co-creator of the film 10 Rules for Dealing with Police.

Related Links:
* 'Will anything sensible be done?' asked Gore Vidal about the drug war, 40 years ago. So far, there's no sign
Allan Massie, The Telegraph
* David Cameron knows the drug laws aren't working; his failure to change them is simple cowardice
Tom Chivers, The Telegraph
* It’s time to end the failed war on drugs
Richard Branson, The Telegraph
* War On Drugs
Report of the Global Commission on Drug Policy
* Ending the War on Drugs would help to fix the budget
E.D. Kain, Forbes

UK Web Hosting by Fri, February 24th, 2012. 12:31 pm