Health Advocacy
NEWHow WikiLeaks Is Changing The Face
Of Journalism
Jane Bryant
The One Click Group NEW
Courage Is Contagious
How To Whistleblow Safely
Julian Assange
WikiLeaks One Click Launches
Support
Dr Sarah Myhill
Campaign
By Jane Bryant Digital Economy Bill
Threatens One Click
By Jane Bryant UPDATED
March 2010
One Click
Freedom
Of Information
UK Police Harassment
In The Internet Era Barbara Loe Fisher
Interview
NVIC Conference
Style, Gonads
Brass Ovaries
By Jane Bryant New Journalism
Challenging
Status Quo
By Jane Bryant
NVIC Conference
USA How The
Judicial Review
Of The CFS/ME
NICE Guidelines
Was Lost
Jane Bryant
The One Click Group The BMJ
Vaccines Propaganda
Professor
David Salisbury
And
Trimedia
Public Relations David Southall
"A Very
Dangerous Doctor"
Panorama swims
with sharks
Lisa Blakemore Brown Dr David Salisbury
Ooops!
Never Mind Me,
I'm Basil Fawlty! ONE CLICK RESPONSE
David Salisbury
Vaccine Litigation Biomedical Test
For ME/CFS Announced
Dr Sarah Myhill
MB BS The Politics
And Commerce
Of Autism
By Lisa Blakemore Brown
Psychologist Poling
Vaccine/Autism Case
Mitochondrial Disfunction
ME/CFS Patients One Click Response
NICE Guidelines One Click Report
Gibson Inquiry How To Solve A Problem Like ME/CFS:
Why The Gibson Report Has Failed Patients Realpolitik and ME
By Martin J. Walker The Consensus Report
Family Law Reform Canadian Definition of ME-CFS The Weird World of Wikipedia
By Martin J. Walker Click here to email us your opinions.
| [Previous] | [Next] |
| [Previous] | [Next] |
| UK Press Complaints Commission Rejects Roy Meadow | ||
| Press Gazette 7 January 2009 PCC clears Times comment piece on cot death jailings By Katie Jacobs  The Press Complaints Commission has rejected a complaint by paediatrician Sir Roy Meadow about an article in The Times claiming his evidence at two trials had "led to the jailing of innocent people". The article, a comment piece by Camilla Cavendish entitled: “A moving response to our family justice campaign”, appeared in the paper on 17 July 2008. Meadow is best known for his theory of "Munchausen syndrome by proxy" - where parents deliberately harm their children to gain attention and sympathy. He was an expert witness at two trials, in 1999 and 2002, involving women suspected of murdering their children and claiming they died of cot death. Sally Clark and Angela Cannings were both jailed, but later appealed and were found innocent and cleared of all charges. Clark was accused of murdering her two sons. In the trial, Meadow claimed that the chances of two babies in the same family dying of cot death was one in 73 million. It was, he added, as likely as an 80-1 horse winning the Grand National four years in a row. This figure was described as "grossly misleading" by a judge during Clark's second appeal hearing. Cavendish wrote in her Times comment piece that Meadow had gone “beyond his remit” in offering statistics, because he was not a statistician. She suggested that, as a result of his comments, he was partly responsible for the wrongful imprisonment of Clarke and Cannings. Meadow made his complaint to the PCC under the accuracy clause, arguing that the newspaper could not justify its remarks. The Times contended that the claims – which were a brief summary of Meadow’s role in the cases – were fair comment. The paper said it had offered to publish a letter of defence from Meadow, but the offer was refused. In its adjudication, the PCC concluded that Cavendish’s remarks about the case were not “inaccurate, misleading or distorted” and that the article was clearly distinguishable as an opinion piece. The Commission said: “Her grounds for coming to this view were the judgments in the two appeals. "Given that how [Meadow] presented statistics was undeniably a feature in the Clark appeal, [we] did not consider that there was any significant inaccuracy in characterising this as him going ‘beyond his remit’. “Similarly, it appeared that there were grounds in the second Clark appeal for the columnist to suggest that his evidence had ‘led to’ her jailing,” it added. |
||
|
||
