The One Click Group

The One Click Group
Health Advocacy

RSS Feed Follow OneClickGroup on Twitter

Dr Iain Stephenson
Found Guilty of Vaccine
Research Fraud
The One Click Group

Mobilising ME/CFS Charities
To Smash Flawed
PACE Trial Results
Lara, Health Advocate

UK Public Health
In Dire Straits
Dr Dick van Steenis MBBS

Lies Damned Lies
Swine Flu
Statistics Exposed
By Lara

Vaccination Graphs
The Awful Stats In Action
Raymond Obomsawin Ph.D

Issues In Immunization
Theory And Practice
Raymond Obomsawin Ph.D

March 2010

One Click
Of Information
UK Police Harassment
In The Internet Era

Barbara Loe Fisher
NVIC Conference
Style, Gonads
Brass Ovaries
By Jane Bryant

New Journalism
Status Quo
By Jane Bryant
NVIC Conference

How The
Judicial Review
NICE Guidelines
Was Lost
Jane Bryant
The One Click Group

Vaccines Propaganda
David Salisbury
Public Relations

David Southall
"A Very
Dangerous Doctor"
Panorama swims
with sharks
Lisa Blakemore Brown

Dr David Salisbury
Never Mind Me,
I'm Basil Fawlty!

David Salisbury
Vaccine Litigation

The Politics
And Commerce
Of Autism
By Lisa Blakemore Brown

Vaccine/Autism Case
Mitochondrial Disfunction
ME/CFS Patients

The Consensus Report
Family Law Reform

Canadian Definition of ME-CFS

The Weird World of Wikipedia
By Martin J. Walker

Click here to email us with any thoughts or opinions you wish to share about the website.


News Archives 5141-5160
Number Title Post Date
5141 One Click Stats, November 2011 01/12/2011 13:01:31
5142 Criminal Attorney Speaks for Controversial CFS Researcher 06/12/2011 14:25:19
5143 Do aluminum vaccine adjuvants contribute to the rising prevalence of autism? 06/12/2011 14:27:12
5144 Should Boys Be Given the HPV Vaccine? Follow The Money 06/12/2011 14:30:11
5145 Big Pharma’s Scam: U.S. Drug companies rig medication studies 06/12/2011 14:34:36
5146 Psychiatric patients unaware of prescription drug risks 06/12/2011 14:36:07
5147 Julian Assange wins right to pursue extradition fight 06/12/2011 14:37:15
5148 Occupy London - Time to 'Occupy Everywhere' on 15 December 06/12/2011 14:39:07
5149 Revealed: secret police memo labels #occupy ‘terrorists’ 06/12/2011 14:45:24
5150 Thug cop to be given £36,000 after assaulting 60 year-old woman 06/12/2011 14:47:03
5151 to require YOU to opt out of data-sharing plan with drug firms 06/12/2011 14:51:32
5152 PR uncovered: Top lobbyists boast of how they influence the UK Prime Minister 06/12/2011 14:54:05
5153 Rioters say anger with police fuelled summer unrest 06/12/2011 14:55:37
5154 Why Are U.S Cops Losing Their Jobs for Questioning the Drug War? 08/12/2011 17:40:35
5155 French Atos Unfit For British Purpose 08/12/2011 17:44:17
5156 UK ConDem government abandons civil liberties pledge 08/12/2011 17:45:25
5157 Archbishop warns of risk of more riots by young 08/12/2011 17:46:36
5158 Bent Britain lobbygate faces toothless PR trade body 08/12/2011 17:53:51
5159 Pfizer pays $72M to women from drug causing breast cancer 08/12/2011 18:01:47
5160 ‘Prozac defence’ stands in Manitoba teen’s murder case 08/12/2011 18:03:11

[Previous] [Next]

Rioters say anger with police fuelled summer unrest
Share |

Rioters say anger with police fuelled summer unrest

Guardian-LSE study of riots – involving hundreds of interviews with participants – reveals deep antipathy towards officers

  • The Guardian, 

Our team collected more than 1.3m words of first-person accounts of the English riots

Widespread anger and frustration at the way police engage with communities was a significant cause of the summer riots in every major city where disorder took place, the biggest study into their cause has found.

Hundreds of interviews with people who took part in the disturbances which spread across England in August revealed deep-seated and sometimes visceral antipathy towards police.

In a unique collaboration, the Guardian and London School of Economics (LSE) interviewed 270 people who rioted in London, Birmingham, Liverpool, Nottingham, Manchester and Salford.

The project collected more than 1.3m words of first-person accounts from rioters, giving an unprecedented insight into what drove people to participate in England's most serious bout of civil unrest in a generation. Rioters revealed that a complex mix of grievances brought them on to the streets but analysts appointed by the LSE identified distrust and antipathy toward police as a key driving force.

Details of the research findings, which are also based on an analysis of an exclusive database of more than 2.5m riot-related tweets, will be unveiled in a series of reports over the next five days. Monday's findings include:

• Many rioters conceded that their involvement in looting was simply down to opportunism, saying that a perceived suspension of normal rules presented them with an opportunity to acquire goods and luxury items they could not ordinarily afford. They often described the riots as a chance to obtain "free stuff" or sought to justify the theft.

• Despite David Cameron saying gangs were "at the heart" of the disturbances, evidence shows they temporarily suspended hostilities. The effective four-day truce – which many said was unprecedented – applied to towns and cities across England. However, on the whole, the research found gang members played only a marginal role in the riots.

• Contrary to widespread speculation that rioters used social media to organise themselves and share "viral" information, sites such as Facebook and Twitter were not used in any significant way. However, BlackBerry phones – and the free messaging service known as "BBM" – were used extensively to communicate, share information and plan riots in advance.

• Although mainly young and male, those involved in the riots came from a cross-section of local communities. Just under half of those interviewed in the study were students. Of those who were not in education and were of working age, 59% were unemployed. Although half of those interviewed were black, people who took part in the disorder did not consider these "race riots".

• Rioters identified a range of political grievances, but at the heart of their complaints was a pervasive sense of injustice. For some this was economic: the lack of money, jobs or opportunity. For others it was more broadly social: how they felt they were treated compared with others. Many mentioned the increase in student tuition fees and the scrapping of the education maintenance allowance.

Although rioters expressed a mix of opinions about the disorder, many of those involved said they felt like they were participating in explicitly anti-police riots. They cited "policing" as the most significant cause of the riots, and anger over the police shooting of Mark Duggan, which triggered initial disturbances in Tottenham, was repeatedly mentioned – even outside London.

For the research, funded by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation and Open Society Foundations, a team of more than 60 academics, researchers and journalists spent three months interviewing people rioters and analysing their accounts. 

The most common complaints related to people's everyday experience of policing, with many expressing deep frustration at the way people in their communities were subjected to stop and search. An independent panel set up by the government in the aftermath of the riots identified stop and search as a possible "motivation factor" for black and Asian rioters.

In findings released last week, the panel – which took evidence from riot-hit communities and victims, but did not speak to rioters – concluded there was no single cause for the riots, but urged police to improve the way stop and search is conducted.  "Where young law-abiding people are repeatedly targeted there is a very real danger that stop and search will have a corrosive effect on their relationship with the police," it said.Of those interviewed in the Reading the Riots study, 73% said they had been stopped and searched in the previous 12 months. They were more than eight times more likely to have been stopped and searched in the previous year than the general population in London.

The Metropolitan police's internal report on the riots, also released last week, appeared to identify simmering tensions with police. Citing community feedback about the riots, the report concluded: "Either the violence was spontaneous without any degree of forethought or … a level of tension existed among sections of the community that was not identified through the community engagement."

The Met said it welcomed the research that provides an insight into why the riots occured "so that police and society can do everything possible to prevent a recurrence".

"We will consider this research alongside the detailed operational review that we are conducting." The force said its own research showed 66% of Londoners believed the MPS does a good job in their area, and that stop and search "can be a highly effective and essential tactic" against knife crime.

It added: "Stop and search will continue to be necessary but we want to ensure that it is only used in an intelligent, professional, objective and courteous way."

The second phase of Reading the Riots, to be completed next year, will draw on interviews with communities, police and judges about their experience of the disturbances and their aftermath.

Related Links:
* Sifting through the rubble from the British riots
Fraser Nelson, Coffee House, The Spectator Blog
* ‘There will be burning and a-looting tonight'
The social and political correlates of law-breaking
Sarah Birch and Nicholas Allen, University of Essex
* Riots stoked by mistrust of politicians, says report
Andrew Grice, The Independent
* Wrong Answers On Bent Britain
Eidtorial, The New York Times

UK Web Hosting by Tue, December 6th, 2011. 02:55 pm