The One Click Group

The One Click Group
Health Advocacy

RSS Feed Follow OneClickGroup on Twitter

Dr Iain Stephenson
Found Guilty of Vaccine
Research Fraud
The One Click Group

Mobilising ME/CFS Charities
To Smash Flawed
PACE Trial Results
Lara, Health Advocate

UK Public Health
In Dire Straits
Dr Dick van Steenis MBBS

Lies Damned Lies
Swine Flu
Statistics Exposed
By Lara

Vaccination Graphs
The Awful Stats In Action
Raymond Obomsawin Ph.D

Issues In Immunization
Theory And Practice
Raymond Obomsawin Ph.D

March 2010

One Click
Of Information
UK Police Harassment
In The Internet Era

Barbara Loe Fisher
NVIC Conference
Style, Gonads
Brass Ovaries
By Jane Bryant

New Journalism
Status Quo
By Jane Bryant
NVIC Conference

How The
Judicial Review
NICE Guidelines
Was Lost
Jane Bryant
The One Click Group

Vaccines Propaganda
David Salisbury
Public Relations

David Southall
"A Very
Dangerous Doctor"
Panorama swims
with sharks
Lisa Blakemore Brown

Dr David Salisbury
Never Mind Me,
I'm Basil Fawlty!

David Salisbury
Vaccine Litigation

The Politics
And Commerce
Of Autism
By Lisa Blakemore Brown

Vaccine/Autism Case
Mitochondrial Disfunction
ME/CFS Patients

The Consensus Report
Family Law Reform

Canadian Definition of ME-CFS

The Weird World of Wikipedia
By Martin J. Walker

Click here to email us with any thoughts or opinions you wish to share about the website.


News Archives 4141-4160
Number Title Post Date
4141 WikiLeaks & Julian Assange Saved My Journalist Bacon & Self-Respect 10/11/2010 11:08:55
4142 U.S. Government Harassing & Intimidating Bradley Manning Supporters 10/11/2010 11:11:17
4143 British Soldiers May Face War Crimes Trial Over Iraqi Civilians Torture 10/11/2010 11:13:48
4144 Torture Sans Regrets - Bush Boasts About Waterboarding 10/11/2010 11:16:19
4145 USA Must Investigate Detainee Abuse Claims In WikiLeaks Files 10/11/2010 11:18:27
4146 How Corrupt Science Gets Published 10/11/2010 11:21:11
4147 Sir Menzies Campbell Slams Legal Aid & UK ConDem Government Injustice In Sanofi-Aventis Epilim Drug Scandal 10/11/2010 11:24:10
4148 UK High Court To Review ConDem Coalition Government Digital Economy Act 11/11/2010 10:37:28
4149 Student & Lecturer Riot Marks End Of UK ConDem Coalition Government Era Of Consensus 11/11/2010 10:44:22
4150 British Police Given Get Out Of Jail Free Card In The Killing Of Azelle Rodney, 24 11/11/2010 10:57:02
4151 'The Alternative Iraq Enquiry' Film Premiere Discussion Now Available On Podcast 11/11/2010 11:00:35
4152 New Survey Shows Most U.S. Doctors Take Pharma Money & Gifts 11/11/2010 11:03:45
4153 Girl's Life In Tatters As LSC & ConDem Government Withdraw Legal Aid From Drug Case 11/11/2010 11:05:48
4154 Children Brain Damaged By Swine Flu Vaccine To Be Investigated 11/11/2010 11:16:57
4155 Who Will Be TIME's 2010 Person Of The Year? Vote For WikiLeaks' Julian Assange! 11/11/2010 11:26:03
4156 State Of Utah USA Sues GlaxoSmithKline Over Avandia Drug 12/11/2010 14:35:16
4157 Our Corrupt British Parliament Is Rotten To The Core 12/11/2010 14:38:18
4158 What We Learned from WikiLeaks 12/11/2010 14:41:49
4159 European Parliament Demands Independent Inquiry On U.S. Behaviour Towards WikiLeaks 12/11/2010 14:45:41
4160 Codex NRVs Are Thrown Back In The Oven For Reheating 15/11/2010 16:22:44

[Previous] [Next]

U.S. Government Harassing & Intimidating Bradley Manning Supporters
Share |

Glenn Greenwald

Government harassing and intimidating Bradley Manning supporters

By Glenn Greenwald

Government harassing and intimidating Bradley Manning supporters
Bradley Manning

(updated below - Update II)

In July of this year, U.S. citizen Jacob Appelbaum, a researcher and spokesman for WikiLeaks, was detained for several hours at the Newark airport after returning from a trip to Holland, and had his laptop, cellphones and other electronic products seized -- all without a search warrant, without being charged with a crime, and without even being under investigation, at least to his knowledge.  He was interrogated at length about WikiLeaks, and was told by the detaining agents that he could expect to be subjected to the same treatment every time he left the country and attempted to return to the U.S.  Days later, two FBI agents approached him at a computer conference he was attending in New York and asked to speak with him again.  To date, he has never been charged with any crime or even told he's under investigation for anything; this was clearly a thuggish attempt by federal officials to intimidate any American citizen involved with or supporting WikiLeaks.

That campaign of intimidation is now clearly spreading to supporters of Bradley Manning.  Last Wednesday, November 3, David House, a 23-year-old researcher who works at MIT, was returning to the U.S. from a short vacation with his girlfriend in Mexico, and was subjected to similar and even worse treatment.  House's crime:  he did work in helping set up the Bradley Manning Support Network, an organization created to raise money for Manning's legal defense fund, and he has now visited Manning three times in Quantico, Virginia, where the accused WikiLeaks leaker is currently being detained (all those visits are fully monitored by government agents).  Like Appelbaum, House has never been accused of any crime, never been advised that he's under investigation, and was never told by any federal agents that he's suspected of any wrongdoing at all.

Last Wednesday, House arrived at Chicago's O'Hare Airport, and his flight was met in the concourse by customs agents, who examined the passports of all deplaning passengers until they saw House's, at which point they stopped.  He was then directed to Customs, where his and his girlfriend's bags were extensively searched.  After the search was complete, two men identifying themselves as Homeland Security officials told House and his girlfriend they were being detained for questioning and would miss their connecting flight.  House was told that he was required to relinquish all of his electronic products, and thus gave them his laptop, cellphone, digital camera and UBS flash drive.  The document he received itemizing his seized property is here.  He was also told to give the agents all of his passwords and encryption keys, which he refused to do.

House was then taken to a detention room by two armed agents and on his way there, he passed by a room in which several individuals were plugging various instruments into his laptop and cellphone.  The two agents, Marcial Santiago and Darin Louck, proceeded to question him for 90 minutes about why he was visiting Manning in prison, what work he did to support the Manning campaign, who else was involved in the Manning support group, and what his views were on WikiLeaks.  He was told that he would not receive his laptop or camera back, and the agents kept it.  To date, he has not received them back and very well may never.  When he told them that he had roughly 20 hours of source code work in his laptop and would like to save it or email it to a saved site, they told him he could not do that.  He subsequently learned from Agent Santiago that although Agent Louck identified himself as a Homeland Security agent, he is, in fact, with the FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force.

What's going on is here obvious.  The Federal Government has the authority to conduct border searches of people entering the country that are far broader than for those inside the country, and such searches require no search warrant.  The Government has that power in order to prevent security threats from entering the country, but here, they are clearly exploiting and abusing it in order to conduct investigative searches which would ordinarily require a search warrant but for which they have no basis to obtain one (in his effort to justify what he did in turning in Manning, Adrian Lamo -- the least credible person on the planet -- has been attempting to convince federal authorities that WikiLeaks is not merely a publisher of classified information, but an "espionage" ring that affirmatively induces leaks, thus enabling its prosecution; to achieve that, he has repeatedly claimed, without a shred of evidence, that MIT students actively assisted Manning in obtaining and leaking the information; in any event, House is not and never was an MIT student).  American citizens who are charged with no crime and not under investigation should not have their laptops permanently seized and searched by law enforcement officials in the absence of reasonable suspicion that they did something wrong.

The real purpose of this conduct is to intimidate and deter anyone from being involved in any way with WikiLeaks and Bradley Manning.  And it works.  I had been invited to go and speak with Manning at Quantico, and still fully intend to do that -- I think Manning, if he did what he's accused of, is the most heroic political figure of the last decade at least -- but of course incidents like these, as intended, implant in your brain the fear that if you do go visit Manning -- or if you donate money to his legal defense fund, donate to WikiLeaks, or otherwise support them in any manner whatsoever -- then you, too, will be put on some list and have your property seized and searched with no search warrant when entering the country, and otherwise harassed and intimidated by the Executive Branch's police agencies.  It's bad enough that the Obama administration has escalated attacks on whistle-blowers through vastly increased prosecutions, but this level of intimidation is clearly targeting legitimate political activity.  It now goes far beyond prosecuting whistle-blowers and is intended to harass and deter those who are merely supportive of them.

UPDATE:  I just want to underscore how abusive this all is.  Totally independent of the intimidation aspects -- which are the worst part of this -- just consider what an absolute mockery this makes of the Constitution.  If House (or Appelbaum) had been inside the U.S., the Government would have never have been able to search or seize their laptops because the Fourth Amendment prohibits that behavior without a search warrant, which they obviously can't obtain.  So instead, the Government just waits for them to leave the country -- which many many people do these days -- and then seizes their belongings and searches all of their communications upon their return, without a shred of judicial review or any basis to establish wrongdoing.  What conceivable purpose is there in having a Fourth Amendment if it can be so easily circumvented this way through the blatant abuse of border searching powers?

UPDATE II:  The aforementioned Appelbaum wrote to me tonight:  "I still have not had my equipment returned [after four months]. I will no longer travel internationally with anything except clothes in my carry on."  Land of the Free.

Related Links:
* Stand With Whistleblower Bradley Manning!
Information Release, Bradley Manning Support Network
* Collateral Murder
Information Release, WikiLeaks

UK Web Hosting by Wed, November 10th, 2010. 11:11 am